NOBODY IS COMING TO UPSKILL YOU
- Aug 1
- 3 min read
THE SAME GAP FROM THE OTHER CHAIR
Last time I wrote about the distance between the skills a résumé claims and the evidence a person can actually produce. I have been turning that over ever since, because the same gap exists on the other side of the table — and over there it is wider.
The shape of it is simple. Ask an organization whether building skills matters and you get near-unanimous agreement. Ask whether they have built anything to do it, and the number falls off a cliff.
CompTIA surveyed 1,049 HR and L&D professionals in April 2026. A net 83% said their organization places a very high or moderately high priority on addressing skill concerns. Then: only 34% claim a formal, organization-wide program for reskilling or upskilling the people already working there (CompTIA, 2026).
Those two numbers came from the same respondents. The same person said "this is a priority" and "we have not built the thing." That is not hypocrisy. It is what a priority looks like before it has a budget line, an owner, and a date. The top barrier named was the cost of training, followed by problems of execution and measurement.
The diagnostic step is rarer still. Skill assessments — where you find out what people cannot do before deciding what to teach them — are run by 53% of companies, and by only 46% of the very largest enterprises. Most programs are broadcasting training at a workforce nobody has examined.
LEARNING IS THE #1 RETENTION STRATEGY AT COMPANIES THAT DO NOT HAVE ONE
LinkedIn Learning's 2025 report surveyed 937 L&D and HR professionals with budget influence, plus 679 learners. 88% of organizations reported concern about employee retention, and providing learning opportunities was respondents' top-ranked retention strategy.
Then they sorted organizations onto a career development maturity curve. Only 36% qualified as "career development champions" — robust programs producing business results. 31% had programs almost nobody used. 33% had nothing at all, or were just getting started (LinkedIn Learning, 2025).
So learning is the leading answer to the problem 88% say they are worried about, and roughly two-thirds have not built a working version of the answer. Stated priority, absent execution — the résumé gap, drawn at organizational scale.
TWO-THIRDS, TWO SURVEYS, ONE CAUTION
Here is where I want to slow down, because these numbers are seductive.
Thirty-four and thirty-six land two points apart, and it is tempting to read that as replication. It is not. Different samples, different years, different countries, different constructs. CompTIA is asking whether a formal organization-wide program exists. LinkedIn is scoring maturity against a curve it designed and scored itself, where "champion" bundles program strength with reported business results. Related, not identical.
Both are also self-report from learning professionals describing their own employers — a population with every reason to be generous. If that skews anything, it skews the estimates high. The real share with something functioning may be smaller than either figure.
What survives all of that is the direction. Two instruments, pointed at overlapping questions, both found about a third with something real and two-thirds without. I would want a third study before defending the decimal. I do not need one to trust the shape.
WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE THE ONE WAITING
The practical read is not cynical. It is just clear-eyed. If you are inside an organization waiting for the development program to arrive, the base rate says it probably will not — not because anyone lied to you, but because the priority never got funded.
So build it yourself, and build it as evidence rather than consumption. Run your own skills assessment, since your employer likely will not. Pick the gap costing you something specific. Then produce artifacts — a documented project, a written rationale, a thing someone can open and evaluate. That is what survives a job change. Internal training that does not exist cannot go in a portfolio anyway.
And if you are the one designing training inside one of these organizations, the same data describes your working conditions. You are probably building without an assessment step, on a priority everyone endorses and nobody funded, for a retention strategy that exists mostly on a slide. Knowing you are in the two-thirds is worth more than assuming you are in the third.
So let me ask you directly: has an employer's stated commitment to your development ever turned into something with a budget and a date attached? I would like to know what actually moved it from a slide to a plan.
Comments